When redesigning navigation wasn't the real problem

The BTG Pactual Bank customer support portal brought together accounts, cards, credit, and onboarding in one place. Our initial hypothesis was about visual organization. User testing proved us wrong.

Company


Role


Year

BTG Pactual Bank


Product Design Lead


2023

~35%

in escalation reduction

+2.1k

users impacted

+4

journeys delivered
01

Context

PLATFORM
One of BTG Pactual Bank's main customer support platforms
SYMPTOM
Scattered information and limited autonomy to resolve cases
GOAL
Reduce operational dependencies and make support workflows faster
BEFORE
Onboarding, transactions, cards, and loans — all in one place, all mixed together.
02

Evidence

The most common issue at Level 1 support wasn't necessarily the most critical at Level 2. The data signaled that our diagnosis needed revisiting — I just didn't know where yet.

L1 OCCURRENCES RANKING

Personal Credit

1.00x

Biometric

0.93x

Credit Limit Request

0.79x

New Card Request

0.67x

Limit Balance

0.64x

L2 OCCURRENCES RANKING

Biometric

1.00x

New Card Request

0.94x

Credit Reassessment

0.77x

Onboarding

0.66x

Refinancig

0.55x

03

The test contradicted the hypothesis

DECISION TURNING POINT

I thought the problem was finding information.
I found out the problem was acting on it.

INITIAL HYPOTHESIS
Information was scattered and lacked visual hierarchy. I believed that reorganizing the navigation would solve the problem.
WHAT TESTING REVEALED
Agents could find the information — but they didn't have the data, permissions, or actions needed to resolve cases on their own.

That shifted the direction of the project. The key findings were:

01 - Critical information had low visibility

High impact

02 - Data and actions needed for autonomous resolution were missing

High impact

03 - Onboarding, cards, and financing concentrated the most dependencies
03 - Onboarding, cartões e financiamento concentravam as
maiores dependências

Medium impact

04

Hard calls

With limited time, we chose depth over coverage.

WHAT WE LEFT BEHIND
Reduced scope — we prioritized only the journeys with the highest operational dependency
WHAT WE GAINED
Focus on the areas driving the most escalations: onboarding, cards, and financing

I reallocated three designers already working on the product to reduce onboarding time and speed up delivery.

Autonomy

Reduced scope

Prior product knowledge

Incremental delivery

05

Building a shared foundation

The project exposed another gap: there were no established standards for internal web products.

Alongside the deliverables, I defined a shared foundation of navigation patterns, layouts, and components so different teams could work with consistency.

This became a prerequisite for scaling delivery, reducing development rework, and making QA validation more predictable.

06

Solution

BEFORE
AFTER
07

Results

~35%

in escalation reduction
em redução
de transbordo

+2.1k

users
impacted

+4

journeys
delivered

1

UI Kit entregue para Dev e QA
UI Kit to Dev / QA
UI Kit shipped
to Dev and QA
WHAT I'D DO DIFFERENTLY
The main lesson was about timing. Users were involved during validation — but they could have contributed even more during discovery, helping shape the scope from the start.